Needs more Pillage, less crap.
Posted By:
Atali
(4/29/2011 9:03:34 PM)
skill testers in every format, i guess...
Posted By:
hllblly413
(4/29/2011 2:23:04 PM)
I'm looking through a booster box's worth of cards, and I can't help but laugh every time I see these goofy reddies pulling down Jung Park's islands with ropes. I don't care if this card is immediately obsolete. It's hilarious.
Posted By:
MrDelicious84
(5/13/2011 10:28:47 PM)
i really wish i could just ask wizards why sometimes, because this card is completely over-costed and literally just doesnt make sense to print. Demolish is pretty much the same card printed in m11 and it costs one less. Unfortunatley all i can say is, i just wish this card was good, i wish it cost less, I mean if this was still the same cost as Demolishi'm sure people would still complain about it, but to add more to it's CMC? Just doesn't make any sense. If Wizards doesn't want to print any effectively costed Land Destruction cards then why even bother printing land destruction ever, especially if we're going to get cards like this? :/ 0.5/5
Posted By:
raadface
(4/29/2011 1:02:20 AM)
lol there tearing down an island GO RED!
Posted By:
Leonidus78
(4/28/2011 8:53:53 PM)
All the cards that add a little poke to the spell don't really seem to be worth it. I really do wish they would make cheap land destruction again. Stone rain and ice storm were in alpha for a reason, to balance the game. Jace decks wouldn't be so prevalent if they would just give us stone rain back; keeps things honest.
Posted By:
Tommy9898
(4/28/2011 11:18:58 PM)
Cards like this make me suspicious of the whole idea of an artifact block, because this would only ever be used as long as Mirrodin is still in rotation. I really hate cards that obsolete themselves. This whole set feels gimmicky, like the frost mechanic from Cold Snap. If Wizards is really that bereft of ideas that they have to revisit old sets, why not fun ones like Ravinca or Shadowmoor? I know it hasn't been that long, but Alara never got its enemy shards...
Posted By:
blindthrall
(5/10/2011 2:33:01 AM)
Mahahahaha, more cards for my land destruction deck! >=D
too bad this kinda sucks, though...
It's like a more overcosted version of demolish with a slight life penalty...
I'll give it 1/5
Posted By:
Fert12334
(4/28/2011 3:43:48 PM)
F*** me runnin a deomolish that also drains 1 life??!!?? and for only ONE more mana? has wizards lost their spellslingin minds??!?!?! enthusiastic sarcasm aside i see why they did it. so in draft and limited they could have a demolish that wasnt quite a demolish with their "not only does this spell do something, they also lose 1 LIFE!" theme.
Posted By:
krauser-gogetthegirl
(4/29/2011 12:21:29 AM)
Yay a pillage that costs nearly twice as much. T_T If I'd want to get rid of a land for 5, I'd implode it. Or conquer it. Or whatever.
0.5/5
Posted By:
majinara
(5/2/2011 9:40:20 AM)