Serpents suck. It's the norm.
Posted By:
JoeVector
(3/5/2010 2:47:27 PM)
Serpents < Wurms.
Posted By:
DacenOctavio
(8/22/2011 11:00:44 PM)
Double its P/T, and it would be good.
Posted By:
Totema
(5/22/2012 6:18:00 PM)
Protip: Shrouded Serpent doesn't have shroud.
Posted By:
Test-Subject_217601
(8/28/2010 8:26:02 PM)
I agree with SavageBrain, im mean what the heck is wrong with that card? A plain 4/4 unblockable creature would still be rather awful with a converted mana cost of seven, but on top of it it's even triple-blue costed, plus it has a drawback that lets the opponent even block the card if he wants to afford the mana!
I have no idea why this was made a rare card, wouldn't have been ground-braking as uncommon in draft either.
Just pay
more and get Tidal Kraken, which is 50% stronger and can't be screwed when attacking.
Or if you're looking for a more playable unblockable 4/4 body, use Ghastlord of Fugue instead.
Posted By:
Mode
(8/24/2009 5:12:21 AM)
Many travelers have wandered into a fog only to pay
and emerge unharmed.
Posted By:
metalevolence
(12/11/2010 6:06:20 PM)
So if the opponent doesn't have untapped lands and has instants in hand (which is highly unlikely by turn eight) then its a 4/4 unblockable . . . that costs seven mana. Was this created as a joke or something?
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(6/24/2009 7:48:43 PM)
Rhystic Serpent?
Posted By:
Continue
(4/1/2013 11:04:38 AM)