If I'm ever rich, I'm going to pay Donato Giancola to just draw hands all day. Just draw hands. Yup.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(2/12/2013 11:30:23 AM)
Great, now we can extract tiny-person DNA from this sample, clone him, and open an amusement park.
In other news, this card isn't too great. You might as well run Icy Manipulator, obviously.
Posted By:
DoctorKenneth
(3/22/2010 5:21:56 PM)
Icy Manipulator is better, like others. But this one seems to be more fair to play for fun.
Posted By:
Anderlfs
(1/1/2011 4:39:18 PM)
I'd so play icy manipulator like these other idiots suggested, but I'm out of ice cream
Posted By:
Anathame
(9/18/2011 10:26:03 AM)
Fits in control decks, isn't as bad as it might first seem. Like icy, it can tap down two of their creatures at once for one of your turns at a crucial point.
Posted By:
Baconradar
(8/27/2010 4:19:15 AM)
I disagree, Icy Manipulator is nothing compared to this card. Yes this card cost three extra manna to activate it's ability, but you can choose to never un-tap it and never have to pay any extra manna again. Therefore, if you are playing smart you will save manna (in the long run) while shutting down a scary permanent.
Posted By:
tsully768
(12/4/2011 12:45:13 AM)
8 mana to shut down a non-planeswalker, non-enchantment permanent, huh? Or, I could play Desert Twister to destroy any permanent for 6 mana. And I thought that Desert Twister was expensive.
Don't get me wrong, Desert Twister isn't strictly better. It can't deal with indestructible creatures, for instance. Still, you're paying a lot for flexibility. Entangling Vines will end up doing what you need from this most of the time.
Posted By:
james2c19v
(2/22/2012 5:49:05 AM)