Memnite, is that you? Wow you really let yourself go!
Posted By:
Gaffy00
(7/30/2011 10:43:43 PM)
I say abuse with Doran for 0 CC 3/3s.
Posted By:
Alan13
(9/19/2010 5:29:53 AM)
Fantasticly useless quick defensive drops that works well with artifact affinity. I usually ran four of these (and four Ornithopters) in a casual Urza-block-era Tolarian Academy deck for Tinker fodder, cheap defense, and good artifact affinity.
Posted By:
annenoise
(2/17/2010 3:35:08 PM)
Most people seem to like Ornithopter, this guy is such a refreshing change... But don't seem to come by/ see him as much as ornithopter though....
Posted By:
AbyssalManZero
(11/13/2009 8:19:24 PM)
Oh what I would give for a reprint of this card... Three zero cost artifact creatures, with Steel Overseer? Now that'd be fun.
Posted By:
Boday1
(4/20/2011 2:16:59 PM)
Wall of Wood eat your heart out.
Posted By:
Atali
(9/16/2010 9:54:49 AM)
Looks like i've found a friend for Ornithopter and Shield Sphere.
Posted By:
GrimGorgonBC
(11/4/2009 2:37:33 PM)
With a name and flavor text like that, I expected another Phyrexian Dreadnought, but a free 0/3???
Posted By:
Superllama12
(4/6/2011 5:07:29 PM)
Looks like a freakin' Boston album cover. That is, awesome.
Posted By:
Goatllama
(11/14/2011 4:40:24 PM)
This is strictly cooler than Ornithopter (strictly cooler in the sense of being generally cooler, not in the sense of being cooler in every situation - both usages are correct, but it seems like MtG internet enthusiasts are passionate about which definition is preferable and are apparently oblivious that both usages are widely accepted in extra-MtG contexts. pro tip: save the passion for issues that matter - issues like genocide, the OED's inclusion of "figuratively" as a definition of "literally", and the appropriateness of the Oxford/serial comma).
Posted By:
The_Erudite_Idiot
(9/23/2013 8:09:46 AM)