"Worse than Nighthawk" is about as insulting as "Worse than Mike Tyson."
This has its place in limited, and it's always nice to see lesser-used creature types get some love.
Posted By:
Tybaltic
(7/9/2013 3:01:57 PM)
@Doaj
Damn, son, now we're comparing it to Baleful Strix? That's not even fair.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(7/10/2013 5:30:33 AM)
Nighthawk isn't a common.
Posted By:
Dalkri
(7/11/2013 8:25:04 AM)
I wonder if this will be viable in MBC in Pauper. No Nighthawk of course, bu this is still excellent in Limited, and potentially viable in pauper. Wish it cantripped or something though.
Posted By:
Doaj
(7/9/2013 10:20:16 PM)
It is a ***atrice therefore it should get 5 stars
I just hope people don't take sharpies to it....
Remember Giant ***roach
Posted By:
master_biomancer
(7/9/2013 4:56:37 PM)
Ain't no Nighthawk, but this still trades with a lot of things and has some solid evasion.
Posted By:
Purplerooster
(7/11/2013 11:00:36 AM)
WotC's way of telling the makers of the ***atrice program to get wrecked.
Posted By:
Ryjhan
(7/11/2013 4:12:10 PM)
I am glad that WotC has realised the error of its ways and is trying to atone for the creation of the abomination known only as Vampire ***hawk.
@Mode: A ***atrice is neither a bird nor a dragon, so why would they do that? Not to mention that dragons are a rare creature type in Black, especially at this mana cost.
Posted By:
Tiggurix
(8/23/2013 1:35:53 PM)