Counting this as a creature is a little odd - it's an object that is carryed by a groop to do a task. It could have been called 'Ram-Squad' and been a non-artifact creature.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(2/24/2010 2:57:33 AM)
Kazabet battering rams are not effective against anything other than buildings so being against defender means it could kill like umm people etc( gaurd duty) battering rams were sometimes hastily made from trees
Posted By:
qaq456
(5/22/2010 12:47:50 AM)
Combos well with Marble Priest
Posted By:
Barjin-N-Blastum
(8/18/2012 1:33:27 PM)
"By the time Mishra was defeated, no mage was foolish enough to rely heavily on walls. Who could have predicted the invention of the giant stick carried by a bunch of people?"
Posted By:
Prizrak
(2/23/2011 1:54:34 AM)
Come on people! Where are the points for FLAVOUR?
This card is dripping with it. A battering ram, that kills walls, AND has banding? (which is awesome btw)
Doesn't get much better than that.
Posted By:
Chess_76
(6/23/2011 4:56:02 AM)
I know it's pretty niche but I'm lovin' this thing.
@ you two - DERP! What does it batter? Fish?
Creature - Goat Baseball player Sous chef
Posted By:
Wraique
(2/23/2010 7:05:32 PM)
That looks more like a giant log than a ram.
Posted By:
Hydrogoose
(3/14/2009 3:25:59 AM)
I thought rams had horns
Posted By:
DaaNz
(3/14/2009 3:26:53 AM)
With ROE coming out, it sure would have been nice if this got changed to Defender instead of Wall when it was deprecated.
Posted By:
Kazabet
(4/15/2010 8:08:34 AM)
Am I the only one who thinks that Batterskull should have given +1/+1, Banding when attacking, and wall deathtouch?
Posted By:
dingophone
(3/29/2012 6:00:27 PM)