ridiculous costs
Posted By:
Imperialstonedragon
(5/7/2011 5:25:00 AM)
The card is actually not bad for multiplayer games (like edh). Beeing able to return any permanent to it's owners hand at instant speed is very powerful. Sure, saccing a permanent ain't fun, but if you a have few tokens flying around it dosen't hurt. Also: would you rather lose to some large dragon hitting you, or sac a land or small creature, to bounce the dragon away. Not to mention: if you use it to bounce any blockers (or pacifism or something), and attack for victory, who cares if you sac some lands to achieve this?
Posted By:
majinara
(7/3/2009 6:14:40 AM)
Expensive, but I use it in my monoblue EDH deck as a sacrifice outlet and repeatable bounce. The cost isn't too high at all when you have all of the mana-doubling artifacts to abuse.
Posted By:
Earthdawn
(6/10/2013 7:59:38 AM)
Isochron Scepter + Unsummon
Posted By:
Androx
(8/8/2012 9:23:30 AM)
I'd say it was good for its time. In a mirror match against blue being able to bounce a permanant with an enchantment ability rather than a spell somone could counter is powerful. Cost should be cheaper but who knows what happened in playtesting?
Posted By:
N03y3D33R
(1/12/2014 8:56:20 PM)