I'd play it just for the joy of being able to say I'm throwing a forest at my opponent. You just can't do that with Fling, no matter how strategically superior it is to this one.
Posted By:
GradiustheFox
(3/4/2010 12:47:08 AM)
This is a bad card, and yet so cool at the same time. I would definitely run it in a casual green/red swing and fling deck for the lulz.
Posted By:
TDL
(10/18/2010 8:12:01 PM)
Cool flavour, cool idea, bad card. Why cann't a giant throw a tree at a creature?
Posted By:
Sironos
(12/5/2010 9:38:09 AM)
The flavor text made me giggle, and at least it's not a horrendous card.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/11/2012 6:25:35 PM)
C'mon it's green permanent burn
Posted By:
Qazior
(2/9/2010 5:55:31 AM)
A 4/4 for 5 is average. Its ability is far below average. Aside from combat tricks with Vigilance...no, its still a bad card. Even if you didn't have to sacrifice a forest to use its ability, its a bad card. It can't even target creatures. Why its a rare is beyond me.
Posted By:
kitsunewarlock
(6/2/2009 5:11:48 PM)
Strictly worse than storm crow
Posted By:
Hydrogoose
(3/15/2009 6:16:54 AM)
has no one heard of grounds keeper itll keep him going forever
Posted By:
BloodMoon1987
(8/22/2011 10:58:13 PM)
Weird card with a red ability that's not that great... but hilarious flavor text.
Posted By:
Lord_Ascapelion
(12/1/2012 2:39:52 PM)