this was good in goblin/sligh decks against control or any deck packing few creatures. The red deck burns through whatever they have and voila! Two damage per turn.
Posted By:
KrosanGardener
(8/6/2009 6:38:29 PM)
I'd rather have jackal pup
Posted By:
storm_crow4presidnt
(4/22/2010 9:17:57 AM)
also encourages blocks that let your warren instigator and goblin lackey through
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(3/3/2011 8:10:34 AM)
Tattermunge Maniac Is Always better But If Your Playing Against Control Or Mill Mightest Well Run All 8
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(12/28/2010 12:01:16 PM)
W...w...what? It's pretty much worse than a 1/1 unless they have no creatures. Hell, it's as good as a 0/1, because you can't do damage if they can block it. You'd need to get a bunch down quickly to make any impact.
Posted By:
Elysiume
(7/8/2009 9:21:37 PM)
Built in donate?
Posted By:
TopRomen
(11/3/2010 5:53:12 PM)
I think the rating is a bit low, although i admit that it won't help you much if your opponent has any creatures.
(Also there are better one-drop goblins with an attack power of 2, like Tattermunge Maniac, Goblin Guide or even Mogg Cons.cripts/Goblin Cohort)
But this provides some fun with Sheltering Ancient.
...downside is that it requires your opponent to attack or block with a creature.
Posted By:
Mode
(6/8/2011 5:17:33 PM)
Urza's block had it's ups and downs. . .
Posted By:
EpitomeOfEvilness
(9/7/2011 8:43:18 PM)
Wait... did... did Master of Etherium say something intelligent?
Posted By:
RJDroid
(10/19/2011 10:29:49 PM)
This was actually played in Red Deck Wins for quite some time, and it was a good creature. It was unlikely you'd do much attacking with a 2/1 when they had blockers anyway, and that's what burn is for.
Posted By:
Magil
(11/12/2012 3:40:17 PM)