I think it bounces three lands as a tribute to Ovinomancer.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(4/10/2011 6:32:11 PM)
Hmm... Although, for once, it is a ratio of one to one land and bounce.
Normally you have to pay more than the number of lands you bounce.
The only exception to this rule, with the soratami, are the legendaries and this card.
Posted By:
Zoah
(8/6/2010 3:41:28 AM)
Temporal Adept is a much better choice for bouncing
Posted By:
C5r1a5z0y
(3/27/2011 4:47:01 PM)
If you're running these heavier land bouncing Soratami, it's usually not for the effect but the cost and it's landfall setup.
I just want to find another way to make this silly folk even more useful.
c :
Posted By:
Deepfried-Owls
(4/19/2011 5:43:54 AM)
should cost less
Posted By:
Imperialstonedragon
(5/13/2011 2:34:11 PM)
I like the fact that it returns 3 lands. normally it's terrible, but i run it in my Lorthos EDH deck, and under stasis lock being able to remove threats and have untapped lands is golden.
\
Posted By:
Ihsan_
(10/3/2011 10:19:24 AM)
lots of people would do well learning how to uses costs to their advantage.
Posted By:
CogMonocle
(6/27/2013 8:45:09 AM)
I like this moonfolk, but then that's because I'm doing it for the cost, not the ability. Mm, delicious landfall.
Posted By:
littlebeast
(3/6/2010 6:17:16 PM)
O.O
Three... lands...?
I wish I had the ability to bounce three of my opponent's lands for the cost of returning a creature to my hand. Having my opponent do it for me at the cost of 3 is just wonderful.
Posted By:
Ichorix
(2/1/2010 7:07:13 PM)
Easily the dumbest of the Moonfolk. Three land is just...really? Really guys?
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(4/13/2012 6:14:39 AM)