Squall costs the same as this. It was printed with an incorrect casting cost in it's Starter 1999 printing.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(3/21/2011 4:25:18 AM)
Wow... that'll clear up the skys
Posted By:
JL_Weber
(3/28/2009 12:02:15 PM)
But Squall only costs less mana, and can't deal with creatures with 3 or 4 toughness. I'd rather play this card, but it's a preference I guess!
Posted By:
Destruction3402
(12/13/2010 11:12:05 PM)
I prefer Squall. It's clearly superior in every way.
Posted By:
xNavarone
(3/21/2010 6:31:59 PM)