What on earth? This is horrible.
Posted By:
jhimbob
(12/18/2009 7:36:07 PM)
i would take browbeat over this anyday, 3 for either 5 damage or 3 for 3 cards
Posted By:
Havens
(2/14/2010 9:25:49 PM)
0.5/5. Why would I pay for seven lightning bolts if I can get the same effect on the actual lightning bolt card? This makes Volcanic Hammer look awesome (its not bad but LB is better). And the card draw effect? Doesnt make it better by a whole lot.
Posted By:
Azuredrake89
(7/22/2010 4:17:16 AM)
Unrealistic.
Believable at five, even sorcery speed.
-1/5.
Posted By:
patronofthesound
(1/16/2013 10:13:26 PM)
Apparently a cantrip in red costs 4.
Posted By:
Mooby
(4/26/2009 2:44:04 PM)
Players bring good cards to market, use good cards in their tourneys, and throw their worst cards away.
Please burn this trash. It's sad to see that a card this bad could make it into the Xbox MTG game.
Posted By:
VoidedNote
(10/13/2010 9:41:38 PM)
This card is way over powered. It does the same thing as Lightning Bolt, but costs 6 more, AND it lets you draw a card? Bigger = better, and this thing is gigantic.
Posted By:
Mustached_Stranger
(5/10/2010 5:16:39 PM)
Poor burn spell, for what reason deserved this card such an ridiculous high cantrip cost increase?
Posted By:
Mode
(10/26/2009 9:49:06 AM)
What? Is this a misprint? Was there some other card or some theme in this set that wanted cards to have a high mana cost? Or is this just a joke?
Posted By:
GainsBanding
(11/6/2010 11:43:41 PM)
uhhh this card makes me sick... how does adding a draw to a lightning bolt add 6 mana? You guys dropped the ball epicly hard... This is unglued
Posted By:
Shinigami-2099
(1/7/2011 9:19:35 AM)