Hmm, this plus Whip of Erebos? Thoughts?
Posted By:
deltaquebec
(10/12/2013 5:41:36 PM)
Hmm if each of the hundred hands can block one creature. Why can't all creatures with two hands block two creatures? There is a flaw in the logic here...
Posted By:
pedrodyl
(9/19/2013 4:26:14 PM)
Math has evaded you guys again...... 2 hands, block one creature. So when he becomes monstrous he blocks 99. Let's show our work here...
99 blocked attackers
2 hands per block
= 198 hands needed..... Not one hundred as wizards thinks. Nor is it 200 like suggested in the comments.
Posted By:
abcdefyou
(4/23/2014 11:04:30 AM)
My biggest problem with this card is that it can only block 100 creatures after it become monstrous, very rarely do you see 100 creature, I have probably seen more infinite creatures than 100, yes I know it for flavor reason but it is kin of annoying in game...
Posted By:
master_biomancer
(9/17/2013 3:43:11 PM)
That's fine, I'll just attack with 100 Spirit tokens...and this monstrous Colossus of Akros equipped with Sword of War and Peace.
Posted By:
SyntheticDreamer
(9/18/2013 9:48:09 AM)
I don't know, I can't even tell you how many times I've been caught at 1 life and attacked with exactly 101 creatures...
Posted By:
SirLibraryEater
(10/14/2013 4:14:53 PM)
Hey, I was wondering if i had HUNDRED HANDED ONE and he was monstrous and my opponent has 30 2/2 my opponent says that it could only kill 6 of them and the rest of the attack would go through to me. IS that correct?
Posted By:
bToBe
(2/19/2014 7:12:51 AM)
The name of the spanish version of this card translates to "He of the Hundred Hands."
Posted By:
OlvynChuru
(6/7/2014 8:34:14 AM)